Notes for draft review at HP in Cupertino at 1:00 on Thursday
	10/14/04.  Jim Thomas was our host.  Dan Zuras, Jon Okada, Dick
	Delp, Alex Liu (phone), Eric Schwartz (phone), Peter Markstein,
	Joe Darcy, Leonard Tsai (phone), David Hough, Jeff Kidder
	(phone), Mike Cowlishaw (phone), & Ivan Godard (arter 3:00)
	attended.

	We went through the list of subcommittee proposals in the
	following order:

	(1) Shall I write a letter to the editor for various magazines
		asking about the signalling NaN question?
		SIAM News, IEEE Computer, CACM, Dr Dobbs,
		comp.arch.arithmetic, NA Digest (Cleve Moler's), et al
		YES
	
	(2) Should we define Annex Z with radix = 2 or 10 or not?
		http://754r.ucbtest.org/drafts/754r.pdf
		pages 87 to 99
		YES
	
	(3) Should we do integers?  Pull Z.1 out of purple.
		http://754r.ucbtest.org/drafts/754r.pdf
		pages 87 to 88
		Write it up first

	(4) Shall we accept debug.sxw?  Annex D.
		http://754r.ucbtest.org/subcommittee/debug.pdf
		Resubmit next time

	(5) Shall we accept correctly rounded base conversion?
		http://754r.ucbtest.org/proposals/base/base.pdf
		http://754r.ucbtest.org/subcommittee/crbase.pdf
		YES

	After we finished with that we continued to discuss the nature
	of the rounding specification we must make in light of my odd
	discovery of Tuesday.  We'll start with the C99 specification.

	We also discussed whether we should ACTUALLY demand looking at
	all those digits on input & PRINTING them on output.  Also, what
	are the default number of digits to print out for each precision
	when the number is unspecified.

	Now that Ivan is here, Dave decided to talk about modes.